美国GRE作文入门和进阶九
(范文)
The correlation of the high irons level and heart disease the arguer trying to prove is not as perfect as he assumes. Although at first glance， his cause-and-effect analysis seems quite cogent， yet it can't stand much reexamination.
I a美国GREe to the well-established theory concerning the necessary relation between the large amount of red meat in people's diet and heart disease， but no other possibilities can be ruled out except for one of the in美国GREdients-iron. It is obvious that the arguer constructs his building of conclusion on the basis of the conviction of the deleterious function stems from the iron. While not only a single iron does red meat contain， as we all know， many other components also have the influential role once being indigested into human body. For instance， some type of particular protein it might include， instead of the iron， is the substantial root of heart attack. So the arguer's peroration has no convincing power for this gratuitous assumption.
Moreover， even though his deduction does really derive from some passage of authoritative researches he has no opportunity to list below， the assertion about the high levels of iron related to the possibility of heart disease cannot be got through by merely so qualified the evidence exhibited here. According to the arguer's elicitation， we believe the red meat does contain large amount of iron， however， we might ask ourselves such questions enlightened by our common sense， “Does the amount of iron involved in red meat reach the dangerous level enough to lead to heart disease?” The answer we can't obtain through this short argument， thus directly make us doubt the whole fruits the arguer attained.
As it stands， the study reported on the published media Eating for Health is inevitable filled with some lethal logic fallacies， which finally weakens the cogency of the whole claims. To such a paramount and sensitive issue relative to people's health and life， scrutiny is not allowed to be neglected; and it is just for this point， I'm afraid， no people could ultimately abjure for eating red meat as a result of reading this ridiculous article. (352 words)
——silentwings
原则二：“大胆创新，敢于说'不'”。
这个原则是就思想内容本身而提出的，主要就ISSUE而言。之所以如此，是因为现在的题库中有太多显而易见的明显带有“常识偏见性”的话题，比如下面我们要举例说明的这一题：
33.“Creating an appealing image has become more important in contemporary society than is the reality or truth behind that image.”
我想大部分考生在现场一定会不约而同地对这道题说“DISA美国GREE”，因为传统的教育和是非观很容易让我们接受这样的一个观点——“人不可貌像，海水不可斗量”。这样，ETS胆敢认为“表面的虚浮外表比实质的东西重要”，充分暴露了它资本主义没落腐朽的罪恶本质和虚伪贪婪的丑恶嘴脸，于是打笔一挥，打他个鼻青脸肿再说。英语作文
【在百度搜索更多与“美国GRE作文入门和进阶九”相关英语作文】