Weight: | 70% |
Word Count: | 1,500 words. All words count except the title, the bibliography, evidences and any appendices. |
Evidence (can submit in black and white, rather than colour if desired) | |
---|---|
|
Completed values grid (from workshop 1) |
|
Evidence of completion of the RHUL Passport challenge dubbed “Make the most of the careers fair: the 2018 commercial awareness challenge”. |
|
Evidence of completion of two additional RHUL Passport challenges of your choice, e.g. Microsoft Word challenge, Bloomberg market concept challenge etc. |
|
A short description of your learning metaphor (refer to lecture 2 slides) |
|
Evidence of feedback from your video interview practice session available from RHUL Careers (please make sure you replace your name with your candidate number) |
|
A copy of your CV highlighting the changes you have made after taking this module and seeking advice from RHUL careers (highlight in bold what has changed on your CV) (please make sure you replace your name with your candidate number) |
|
A cover letter to an accounting or finance internship or graduate role in any industry and country of your choice. Alternatively, you may refer to the British Airways job advert from Workshop 2 and write a cover letter for that role. If you do not use the British Airways job then please include the job advertisement to which your cover letter relates. (See https://moodle.royalholloway.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=3259§ion=10 for tips on how to write your cover letter. You may also seek advice from RHUL careers on how to write a cover letter) |
|
Evidence of a personal profile on LinkedIn or other career oriented social media platform. If you are engaged in any forums on LinkedIn, please provide evidence (a photo of your LINKEDIN page will do). |
|
Using the STAR technique, prepare a one-page document to answer the following questions:
|
|
Evidence that you have engaged with at least one on-campus career event during the term. |
|
Evidence of completion of one of each of the following Psychometric tests (print out test scores and completion reports):
Please note that the diagnostic test for verbal reasoning and numeracy do not count for this section |
|
Evidence of completion of all AF1407 Moodle videos and tests at appropriate pass rate (print out of test scores). |
|
Any other evidence you have to support your academic and career plans – these could be from work, volunteering and or being a student member of a professional body. |
Reflective Ability 30% | Writing style 30% | Completeness 20% | Quality of referencing 15% | Formatting and Use of aids 5% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evidence of careful consideration and critical analysis of how the course, the academic programme, RHUL career resources and programmes, social activities, career theories and personal value influence career goals and academic plans | Level of professionalism expressed through writing style and appropriate spelling, grammar and punctuation. | Evidence supporting reflection has been well organised, is complete and has been carefully linked to the discussion. | Use of appropriate in-text reference and reference list/bibliography using Harvard style. | Use of appropriately referenced figures and tables, and formatting, to enhance delivery. | ||
FIRST CLASS | 82,85,88, 92,95,98 | Critical reflection on the evidence presented and its implication for academic and career progression is outstanding for a first attempt at reflective writing. | Outstanding fluency in writing style. Attention to spelling, punctuation and/or grammar is outstanding for second attempt at writing for an academic audience. | Evidence provided for the portfolio goes well beyond the recommended minimum, is comprehensive, well organised and demonstrates an outstanding commitment to building a career development plan. All the evidence is linked appropriately to the written piece. | Outstanding accuracy in presentation. Outstanding competence in Harvard referencing and bibliography format. | Paragraphs are very well structured. Outstanding professional and enhancing use of aids – referenced tables and figures, formatting (bullets, alignment of text), font sizes, colour, background. |
72,75,78 | Critical reflection on the evidence presented and its implication for academic and career progression is excellent for a first attempt at reflective writing. | Excellent fluency in writing style. Attention to spelling, punctuation and/or grammar is excellent for second attempt at writing for an academic audience. | Evidence provided for the portfolio goes beyond the recommended minimum, is comprehensive, well organised and demonstrates an excellent commitment to building a career development plan. Almost all the evidence is linked appropriately to the written piece. | Excellent accuracy in presentation. Excellent competence in Harvard referencing and bibliography format. | Paragraphs are generally well structured. Excellent professional and enhancing use of aids – referenced tables and figures, formatting (bullets, alignment of text), font sizes, colour, background. | |
UPPER SECOND | 62,65,68 | Critical reflection on the evidence presented and its implication for career and academic progression is very good for a first attempt at reflective writing. | Very good fluency in writing style. Attention to spelling, punctuation and/or grammar is very good for second attempt at writing for an academic audience | Evidence provided for the portfolio is comprehensive, well organised and demonstrates very good commitment to building a career development plan. Almost all the evidence is linked appropriately to the written piece. | Very good accuracy in presentation. Very good competence in Harvard referencing and bibliography format. | Paragraphs are generally well structured with some exceptions. Very good professional and enhancing use of aids – formatting (bullets, alignment of text), font sizes, colour, background. |
LOWER SECOND | 52,55,58 | Critical reflection on the evidence presented and its implication for career progression is good for a first attempt at reflective writing. | Good fluency in writing style. Attention to spelling, punctuation and/or grammar is good for second attempt at writing for an academic audience |
Evidence provided for the portfolio is comprehensive, well organised and demonstrates good commitment to building a career development plan. Most of the evidence is linked appropriately to the written piece. |
Good accuracy in presentation. Good competence in Harvard referencing and bibliography format. | Paragraph structure is generally good. Good professional and effective use of aids. |
THIRD CLASS | 42,45,48 | Critical reflection on the evidence presented and its implication for career progression is satisfactory for a first attempt at reflective writing. | Satisfactory fluency in writing style. Attention to spelling, punctuation and/or grammar is satisfactory for second attempt at writing for an academic audience | Evidence provided for the portfolio is comprehensive, well organised and demonstrates satisfactory commitment to building a career development plan. Less than half the evidence is linked appropriately to the written piece. | Satisfactory accuracy in presentation. Satisfactory competence in Harvard referencing and bibliography format. | Paragraphs are fairly well structured. Appropriate choice of aids but distracting or poorly integrated. |
FAIL | 35 | Critical reflection on the evidence and its implication for academic and career progression is weak for a first attempt at reflective writing. |
Weak fluency in writing style. Attention to spelling, punctuation and/or grammar is weak for second attempt at writing for an academic audience |
Evidence provided for the portfolio is limited and demonstrates a weak commitment to building a career development plan. Little of the evidence has been linked appropriately to the written piece. |
Weak accuracy in presentation. Weak competence in Harvard referencing and bibliography format. |
Paragraph structures are problematic. Use of aids is satisfactory but could have been better set up. |
25 | Critical reflection on the evidence and its implication for academic and career progression is poor for a first attempt at reflective writing. |
Poor fluency in writing style. Attention to spelling, punctuation and/or grammar is poor for second attempt at writing for an academic audience |
Evidence provided for the portfolio is very limited and demonstrates a poor commitment to building a career development plan. Linkage of the evidence to the plan is very weak. |
Poor accuracy in presentation. Poor competence in Harvard referencing and bibliography format. |
Paragraph structures are problematic. Use of aids is poor. |
|
15 | Little reflection on the evidence presented and its implication for academic and career progression has been provided. | Little to no fluency in writing style. Attention to spelling, punctuation and/or grammar is absent. | Little evidence has been provided for the portfolio, which demonstrates a very poor commitment to building a career development plan. Linkage of the evidence to the plan is very poor. |
Little to no accuracy in presentation. Little or no competence in Harvard referencing and bibliography format. |
Paragraph structures are extremely problematic. Ineffective use of aids. |
|
0 | There is no evidence of reflection on the evidence presented and its implications for academic and career development. | No fluency in writing style. No attention to spelling, punctuation and/or grammar. | No evidence has been provided for the portfolio signalling a lack of commitment to developing a career plan. |
No accuracy in presentation. No competence in Harvard referencing and bibliography format. |
There are no paragraphs in the document. No aids have been used. |